Are Women Really Only Dating the Top 1% of Men? New Research Says No — And the Truth Is Much More Interesting

by | Nov 25, 2025 | Research | 0 comments

If you’ve spent any time online lately, you’ve probably encountered the modern myth of romance:

“Women are all chasing the top 1% of men…
Young men can’t get any sex…
Society is collapsing…
And only the gurus (usually selling a course) can save us.”

It’s a dramatic story.
It makes for great podcast content.
And it’s extremely profitable—for the people telling it.

But here’s the inconvenient part:
The actual data does not support it at all.
In fact, the real story is more normal, less apocalyptic, and—ironically—way more interesting.


First, the big plot twist: everyone is having less sex

Not just men.
Not just “beta males.”
Everyone under 30 is seeing a noticeable drop in sexual activity.

The highlights:

  • A 2023 analysis found 38% of Californians aged 18–30 had zero sexual partners last year.
    [Ref 1]
  • Millennials born in the 90s were twice as likely as Gen X to have no sexual partners since 18.
    [Ref 2]
  • Weekly sex across adults plunged from 55% (1990) to 37% (2024).
    [Ref 3]

If this is a “sexual marketplace,” it’s the slowest marketplace in history.
Even the bears would be bored.

Translation:
This isn’t a case of “women having too many options.”
It’s simply a generation having… less sex.
Period.


Gen Z is also dating less—so the math checks out

You can’t have sex if you never meet anyone. Simple biology.

  • Around 44% of Gen Z men report zero romantic relationship experience.
    [Ref 4]
  • Young adults are living with parents longer, socializing less in person, and spending more time on devices than ever before.

It’s not “rejection.”
It’s isolation + screens + economy + exhaustion.

No villain. No conspiracy.
Just physics:
If you never leave the house, you meet approximately zero people, and it’s hard to feel sexy with Mom in the next room.


Women are not exclusively chasing the “top 1% of men”

This is the part where red-pill influencers dramatically clutch their pearls, but the studies are clear.

What the data shows:

  • Women’s ratings of attractiveness skew low,
    but their messaging doesn’t.
    They mostly message men who are just slightly above average.
    [Ref 5]
  • Men tend to “aim up” and message more desirable partners.
    Women message similar partners.
    [Ref 6]
  • eHarmony found that men who think they’re “10/10 hot” actually get fewer messages than men who rated themselves 5–9/10.
    [Ref 7]

Let me repeat that last one for the folks in the back:

Being extremely hot is not a cheat code.
Being moderately attractive is actually better for incoming messages.
Which means the entire “elite men hoard all the women” storyline… doesn’t match reality.


The real reasons sex is down are boring—but important

No guru wants to talk about these because they don’t sell $499 masculinity courses.

The actual big drivers:

  • Digital life
    Phones replaced flirting.
    TikTok replaced mingling.
    Porn replaced exploration.
    DMing replaced talking.
    (None of this is sexy.)
  • Economics
    Housing is expensive.
    Privacy is rare.
    Stress is high.
    Anxiety kills libido faster than any dating app.
  • Delayed adulthood
    Young adults are hitting milestones later: jobs, independence, relationships, and families.
  • Consent + mental health awareness
    People are more cautious, more thoughtful, and less impulsive with sex.

Not exactly the fire-and-brimstone nightmare the internet promised.
Just a different world.


And no—“sexless young men” are not becoming more dangerous

This narrative gets repeated over and over, but it collapses the second you look at crime data.

  • Violent victimization is way down from the 1990s peak.
    [Ref 8]
  • Youth sexual offense rates have generally declined over the past few decades.
    [Ref 9]

If “lack of sex causes chaos,” the crime charts forgot to cooperate.

Reality check:
Young men aren’t becoming violent because they’re not having sex.
They’re not having sex because society changed.


So what’s actually happening?

After all the research, the most accurate summary is:

Modern dating isn’t broken.
It’s just different.

  • People are more isolated.
  • They socialize less in person.
  • They date less frequently.
  • Sex is no longer the primary coping mechanism for stress, trauma, or boredom.
  • Women aren’t chasing the top 1%.
  • Men aren’t being systematically rejected.
  • The “sexual crisis” is really a structural shift, not a romantic apocalypse.

If anything, young people might be developing healthier, slower, more intentional relationship habits—just in a world that doesn’t look anything like the one older generations grew up in.


References

  1. Los Angeles Times, survey on sexual partners among young adults (2023)
  2. Twenge, et al., Archives of Sexual Behavior, declines in sexual activity among young adults
  3. Institute for Family Studies, national sexual frequency trends (2024)
  4. American Institute of Behavioral Medicine, Gen Z relationship experience data
  5. Haverford College analysis of OkCupid messaging patterns
  6. PLOS One, “Desirability and Mate Choice on Online Dating Platforms” (2018)
  7. Oxford Internet Institute + eHarmony, “The New Leading Man” analytics
  8. Bureau of Justice Statistics, violent victimization trends
  9. UNH Crimes Against Children Research Center, long-term sexual abuse case decline

Written by Jake Strack

Related Posts

Resonant Stewardship Ethics and Violence

Resonant Stewardship Ethics and Violence

Why Safety May Require Containment—but Never Cruelty Any ethical framework that cannot speak honestly about violence is incomplete. Resonant Stewardship Ethics (RSE) places agency—the capacity to pause, reflect, and choose—at the center of moral concern. That...

read more

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.